Perbandingan antara Persepsi Implisit dan Ekspresi Eksplisit Mahasiswa dalam EDOM (Evaluasi Dosen oleh Mahasiswa)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53088/eej.v5i1.3126Keywords:
Lecturer Evaluation, Implicit Perception, Assessment Bias, Assessment ManipulationAbstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to prove the difference between explicit expressions and implicit perceptions of students in the EDOM (Lecturer Evaluation by Students) assessment component.
Methodology: This study uses a quantitative approach with a comparative design. The data in this study consisted of: (1) EDOM filling data, (2) EDOM refill data, and (3) EDOM interpretation data by the author. The subject and informant in this study are students of the PGSD (Elementary School Teacher Education) Study Program at UMS (University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta). Samples are selected purposively. The validity of the data in this study was ascertained using factor analysis. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis.
Result: From the calculation of the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, it shows that there is a difference between explicit expression and implicit perception of students on the criteria of learning methods, interaction with students, and satisfaction levels. Similarly, the comparison of the average scores between explicit expression and students' implicit perceptions showed a significant difference in all criteria with better explicit expression.
Recommendation: Further research is recommended to identify the psychological, social, and external factors that influence student non-conformity in EDOM assessments
References
Akbari, M., Nemati-Karimooy, A., & Ghasemi, F. (2016). The relationship between some teaching micro skills during classroom teaching and the level of students’ learning. Razavi International Journal of Medicine, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.17795/rijm37929
Blumberga, S. (2015). University professors’ epistemic authority assessment in actual and time-remote interaction. Society, Integration, Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 90. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.303
Choi, J. (2012). Attitudes of international music students from East Asia toward U.S. higher education institutions. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411433719
Cook, C., Jones, J., & Al-Twal, A. (2021). Validity and fairness of utilising student evaluation of teaching (SET) as a primary performance measure. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1895093
Elmas, G., Aris, T. M., & Hidayati, N. (2023). Survey of ideal lecturer interested by students IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Jasmani dan Keolahragaan, 1(1), 410–418.
Fox, R. (1994). Validating lecturer effectiveness questionnaires in accounting. Accounting Education, 3(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289400000023
Hasibuan, R. H., Berutu, F. R., & Lestari, D. (2021). Analisis kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kinerja mengajar dosen UINSU. Jurnal Al-Iqtishad, 17(1), 141.
Khaola, P., & Thetsane, R. (2021). The validity and reliability of student evaluation of teaching at the National University of Lesotho. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v8i1.13367
Khong, T. L. (2014). The validity and reliability of the student evaluation of teaching: A case in a private higher educational institution in Malaysia. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(9), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss9.238
Knol, M. H., Dolan, C. V., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2016). Measuring the quality of university lectures: Development and validation of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ). PLOS ONE, 11(2), Article e0149163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149163
Lama, T., Arias, P., Mendoza, K., & Manahan, J. (2015). Student evaluation of teaching surveys: Do students provide accurate and reliable information? e-Journal of Social & Behavioural Research in Business, 6(1), 30–39.
Lee, K. H. (2010). A study on validity and reliability of students’ evaluation. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21(1), 87–98.
Mittal, S., Gera, R., & Batra, D. K. (2015). Evaluating the validity of student evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SET) in India. Education + Training, 57(6), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2013-0072
Montshiwa, V. T., & Moroke, N. D. (2014). Assessment of the reliability and validity of student-lecturer evaluation questionnaire: A case of North West University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(14), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p352
Murdiyanto, T., & Wijayanti, D. A. (2021). Evaluasi persepsi dan sikap mahasiswa terhadap lingkungan pembelajaran blended learning mata kuliah Kalkulus Integral Prodi Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNJ. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 5(1), 45–46. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.051.03
Odukoya, J., Atayero, A., Alao, A., & Afolabi, A. (2014). The concurrent and predictive validity of Covenant University students’ evaluation of lecturers’ teaching competence. In EDULEARN14 Proceedings (pp. 6316–6323). IATED.
Prasetia, B. A. (2022). Studi perbandingan hasil uji Wilcoxon pada data hasil pengukuran dan hasil kategori data penelitian kesehatan tingkat stress tekanan darah dan motorik halus. Jurnal Ilmiah Pamenang, 4(2), 8–15.
Raziel, A. Á., & Miranda, M. O. (2011). Fiabilidad y validez en la evaluación docente universitaria / Reliability and validity assessment in the university teaching. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v10i1.10089
Richmond, A. S., Berglund, M. B., Epelbaum, V. B., & Klein, E. M. (2015). a + (b1) professor-student rapport + (b2) humor + (b3) student engagement = (ŷ) student ratings of instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 42(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315569924
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M. N. O., & Griffiths, M. D. (2000). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611436
Sonntag, M. E., Bassett, J. F., & Snyder, T. (2009). An empirical test of the validity of student evaluations of teaching made on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802079463
Sugiarti, E., Mukrodi, M., & Mawardi, S. (2021). Monitoring kinerja dosen: Manfaat dan dampaknya terhadap perguruan tinggi. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 4(4), 816–822.
Sugiyono. (2015). Statistika untuk penelitian. Alfabeta.
Syabila, M., & Khair, M. (2022). Persepsi mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika terhadap pembelajaran daring pada masa COVID-19. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 3(1), 1–7.
Zhao, J., & Gallant, D. J. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: Exploring issues of validity and reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.523819
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Guntur Nurcahyanto, Muhamad Taufik Hidayat, Atika Azzahro Hazima, Achmad Januar Arifin, Putri Pramesti Hening, Annisa Fitri, Tivana Aulia Sasmito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license that allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s) and license their new creations under the identical terms.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
