Language Feasibility in Students' Textbooks Grade 1 Elementary School

Authors

  • Nugroho Bagus Budiono Professional Teacher Education Program, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/eej.v3i2.1765

Keywords:

alignment communicative, language eligibility, student development, Communicative

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the language feasibility of the Grade 1 student textbook on the theme Kegemaranku (My Favorites) from the 2013 Curriculum published by the Ministry of Education and Culture, focusing on its conformity to students' developmental levels, communicative effectiveness, and the coherence of its content structure.

Method: A qualitative descriptive approach with content analysis was employed. The data were collected from the Kegemaranku textbook and analyzed through an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, based on the BSNP (National Education Standards Agency) textbook assessment guidelines.

Results: The analysis revealed that the textbook achieved high feasibility scores: 94.79% for conformity with student development, 92.70% for communicativeness, and 96.35% for the alignment and integration of thought flow. These results categorize the textbook as "very feasible" across all assessed dimensions, although minor inconsistencies were found in explaining abstract concepts and applying Indonesian language rules in certain sub-themes.

Implication: The findings suggest that the textbook can effectively support Grade 1 students’ cognitive, social-emotional, and language development. However, continual monitoring and refinement are recommended to ensure even higher linguistic clarity and developmental alignment, which are critical for achieving curriculum goals.

Novelty: This study offers a comprehensive and specific evaluation of language feasibility in early grade textbooks by integrating indicators of communicative clarity and developmental appropriateness based on the 2013 Curriculum. It highlights the need for systematic textbook reviews even for materials officially endorsed by national education authorities.

References

Adelina, Novilia, dkk. (2017). Buku Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 Kelas 1 SD Tema Kegemaranku. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2016). Deskripsi Butir Instrumen - 1 Matematika Buku Siswa SD. Diakses dari https://bsnp-indonesia.org/ pada 9 Maret 2019.

Chang, C. C., & Silalahi, S. M. (2017). A review and content analysis of mathematics textbooks in educational research. Journal of Education in the 21st Century, 75(3), 235–251. Diakses dari http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol75/235-251.Chang_Vol.75-3_PEC.pdf pada 15 Oktober 2019.

Desstya, A. (2015). IPA dan Pembelajaran Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS) 2015. Diakses dari https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/7979/5820 pada 15 September 2019.

Fadhli, M. (2017). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2). Diakses dari http://journal.staincurup.ac.id/index.php/JSMPI/article/viewFile/295/218 pada 15 September 2019.

Fatima, S. K. S., & Sultan, H. (2015). Textbook analysis and evaluation of 7th & 8th grade in Pakistani context. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4), 79–97. Diakses dari http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Textbook-Analysis-and-Evaluation-of-7th-8th-Grade-in-Pakistani-Context.pdf pada 15 November 2019.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Dasar (SD)/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Buku yang Digunakan dalam Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslich, M. (2010). Textbook Writing: Dasar-Dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Nisa, Q. M. (2015). Analisis Kelayakan Isi Buku Teks Siswa Kelas IV SD/MI Tema Peduli Terhadap Makhluk Hidup Kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Diakses dari http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/4603/1/113911082.pdf pada 31 Agustus 2019.

Purnanto, A. W., dkk. (2016). Analisis Kelayakan Bahasa dalam Buku Teks Tema 1 Kelas I Sekolah Dasar Kurikulum 2013. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 102–111. Diakses dari http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ppd/article/download/2773/3509 pada 31 Agustus 2019.

Syamsul Ma'arif. (2011). Mutiara-Mutiara Dakwah KH Hasyim Asy’ari. Bogor: Kanza.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Diakses dari http://hukum.unsrat.ac.id/uu/uu_20_03.htm pada 15 November 2019.

Warahmah, dkk. (2017). Persepsi Guru terhadap Materi Matematika di Buku Guru dan Buku Siswa Kelas IV, V, VI pada Kurikulum 2013 di Gugus Delima Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Unsyiah, 2(1). Diakses dari https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/188454-ID-persepsi-guru-terhadap-materi-matematika.pdf pada 15 November 2019.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Budiono, N. B. (2024). Language Feasibility in Students’ Textbooks Grade 1 Elementary School. Elementary Education Journal, 3(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.53088/eej.v3i2.1765