Implementasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru di SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta
Keywords:
Assessment, Performance, TeacherAbstract
Aim of the research are to describe the implementation of teacher performance assessment, supporting, and inhibiting factors of teacher performance assessment at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta. This type of research is a qualitative research with a case study design. Data collection are done by in-depth interview, observation and documentation. Data analysis using an interactive analysis model. The results of the study concluded that 1) The implementation of teacher performance assessment at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta is held once a year periodically divided into two activities, namely the teacher's self evaluation period and the assessment period. Teacher performance assessment methods are carried out through observation and monitoring. The implementation of Teacher Performance Assessment at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta in 2017 and 2018 has increased from the Fair category to the Good category. 2) Factors that support teacher performance assesment at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta are good coordination between the principal, the assessment team, and teacher, the effectiveness of the teacher in carrying out learning, and the teacher has participated in educational equalization activities. 3) Inhibiting factors of teacher performance assesment at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta are the lack of operational funding support from the government, Teacher Performance Assessment schedules that conflict with other activities, and time constraints.
References
Abidin, Z. & Sutrisno. 2014. Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG) dalam Upayanya Melakukan Penjaminan Mutu Guru di dalam Kelas (Studi Penelitian pada SMA/sederajat Swasta Kec. Pasar Minggu Jakarta Selatan). Research and Development Journal Of Education Vol. 1 No.01. Oktober 2014.
Ahmad, L.O.I. 2017. Konsep Penilaian Kinerja Guru dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Idaarah, Vol. I, No. 1, Juni 2017.
Almeida, de J.C. 2017. “Teacher Performance Evaluation: The Importance of Performance Standards”. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Volume 8, Issue 1, pp. 2973-2981.
Chukwubikem, P.E.I. 2013. “Developing Better Teacher Evaluation”. Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 49-58.
Firyomanto; Wibawanto, H & Syamwil, R. 2016. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Penilaian Diri, Teman Sejawat, Dan Penilaian Oleh Siswa . JERE 5 (1) (2016).
Harjali. 2016. Implementasi Evaluasi Kinerja Guru Di MA Al-Islam Joresan Mlarak Ponorogo. Nadwa, Jurnal Pendidikan IslamVol. 10 , Nomor 1, April 2016.
Ikbal, P.A.M. 2018. Manajemen Pengembangan Kompetensi Profesional Guru. Jurnal Islamic Education Manajemen, Vol. 3, No. 1, hlm. 65-75.
Jiayi, W. dan Ling, C. 2012. “Reviewing Teacher Evaluation of Rewards and Punishments: The Overview of Chinese Teacher Evaluation Research”. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Education Research International, Volume 2012, Article ID 184640, pp. 1-17.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2012. Buku 2 Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Kemendikbud, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Profesi Guru.
Kusdiawan, W. 2017. Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Pengusulan, Penilaian Dan Penetapan Angka Kredit Guru (Sipulpenpakguru). Jurnal Interkom, Vol.12, No. 1, hlm. 20-29.
Lubna. 2014. Akurasi Dan Akuntabilitas Penilaian Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam. Ulumuna Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Volume 18 Nomor 1 (Juni) 2014.
Luskova, M & Hudakova, M. 2013. Approaches To Teachers’ Performance Assessment For Enhancing Quality Of Education At Universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 106 (2013) 476-484.
Mpungose, J.E. & Ngwenya, T.H. 2014. “Managing Teacher Performance And Its Appraisal: Dilemmas Of School Principals”. Problems of Education in The 21st Century, Volume 62, pp. 74-85.
Saljoogi, B. & Salehi, K. 2016. “Developing a Teacher Evaluation Model: The Impact of Teachers’ Attitude toward the Performance Evaluation System (PES) on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment with the Mediating Role of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy”. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 5(S), pp. 200-209.
Steinberg, M. P. & Garrett, R. 2016. Classroom Composition and Measured Teacher Performance: What Do Teacher Observation Scores Really Measure?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis June 2016, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 293 –317.
Sugiyarti dan Sumardjoko, Bambang. 2017. Pengelolaan Program Induksi Guru Pemula (PIGP) di SMP Negeri 3 Kunduran Blora. Varia Pendidikan, Vol. 29, No. 1, Juni 2017: 9-17
Sumardjoko, Bambang. 2017. Pemetaan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. The 5th Urecol Proceeding: UAD, Yogyakarta.
Zhang, X.F. & Ng, H.M. 2015. “An Effective Model of Teacher Appraisal: Evidence from Secondary Schools in Shanghai, China”. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, pp. 1-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license that allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s) and license their new creations under the identical terms.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
