Purchase intention to virtual influencer marketing: Social presence theory highlights authenticity over influencer type

Authors

  • Erika Putri Wulandari Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti
  • Steffen Hasta Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti
  • Yolanda Masnita Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti
  • Husna Leila Yusran Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jmdb.v6i1.2605

Keywords:

Virtual Influencer Marketing, Anthropomorphism, Perceived Authenticity, Purchase Intention

Abstract

Purchase intention endorsed by virtual influencers remains inconsistent across studies, leaving a practical gap in how exposure translates into buying. This study examines whether anthropomorphic appearance and behavior increase purchase intention via social presence and perceived authenticity, and whether influencer type matters. Guided by Social Presence Theory, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey; the hypothesized relationships were evaluated using SEM. Results show that anthropomorphic appearance and behavior significantly heighten social presence, social presence increases perceived authenticity, and perceived authenticity strongly predicts purchase intention. Conversely, influencer type shows no meaningful effect on authenticity and does not improve the indirect pathway from anthropomorphism to purchase intention. The findings recommend that practitioners prioritize human-like visual and behavioral cues and design interactions that cultivate social presence and authenticity rather than relying on celebrity status. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, use of a single virtual influencer stimulus, and a relatively homogeneous sample; future work should test multiple stimuli using longitudinal designs.

References

Ahn, R. J., Cho, S. Y., & Sunny Tsai, W. (2022). Demystifying Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) Influencers: The Effect of Perceived Anthropomorphism and Social Presence on Brand Outcomes. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 22(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2111242

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Andonopoulos, V., Jiyeon, J., & Mathies, C. (2023). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Authentic isn ’ t always best : When inauthentic social media influencers induce positive consumer purchase intention through inspiration ☆. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75(July), 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103521

Annisa, R. F. M., & Yusran, H. L. (2022). Pengaruh Beauty Influencer Terhadap Purchase Intention Melalui Brand Image. Ijd-Demos, 4(3), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i3.285

Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021). Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694

Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Dabiran, E., Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Grant, G. (2024). Virtually human: anthropomorphism in virtual influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103797

Davlembayeva, D., Chari, S., & Papagiannidis, S. (2025). Virtual Influencers in Consumer Behaviour: A Social Influence Theory Perspective. British Journal of Management, 36(1), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12839

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000

Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375

Khalfallah, D., & Keller, V. (2025). Acta Psychologica Authenticity , ethics , and transparency in virtual influencer marketing : A cross-cultural analysis of consumer trust and engagement : A systematic literature review. Acta Psychologica, 260(July), 105573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105573

Kim, H., & Park, M. (2024). When digital celebrity talks to you: How human-like virtual influencers satisfy consumer’s experience through social presence on social media endorsements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103581

Lou, C., Kiew, S. T. J., Chen, T., Lee, T. Y. M., Ong, J. E. C., & Phua, Z. (2023). Authentically Fake? How Consumers Respond to the Influence of Virtual Influencers. Journal of Advertising, 52(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641

Munnukka, J., Talvitie-Lamberg, K., & Maity, D. (2022). Anthropomorphism and social presence in Human–Virtual service assistant interactions: The role of dialog length and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, 107343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107343

Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users’ Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289

Ozdemir, O., Kolfal, B., Messinger, P. R., & Rizvi, S. (2023). Human or virtual: How influencer type shapes brand attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107771

Ren, L., Lee, S. K., & Chun, S. (2023). The effects of influencer type, regulatory focus, and perceived authenticity on consumers’ purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12898

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898

Sintia, L., Siagian, Y. M., & Kurniawati, K. (2023). The Determinants of Purchase Intention in Social Commerce. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 14(1), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v14i1.15754

Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164

Yan, J., Xia, S., Jiang, A., & Lin, Z. (2024). The effect of different types of virtual influencers on consumers’ emotional attachment. Journal of Business Research, 177, 114646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114646

Yin, G., Pei, Y., Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Wang, S. (2025). Virtual influencers in marketing: addressing authenticity challenges through anthropomorphism. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2025-0025

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

How to Cite

Wulandari, E. P., Hasta, S., Masnita, Y., & Yusran, H. L. (2026). Purchase intention to virtual influencer marketing: Social presence theory highlights authenticity over influencer type. Journal of Management and Digital Business, 6(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.53088/jmdb.v6i1.2605

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Management and Digital Business

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Erika Putri Wulandari, Steffen Hasta, Yolanda Masnita, Husna Leila Yusran

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license that allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s) and license their new creations under the identical terms.

License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/