Komposisi sektoral dan pertumbuhan ekonomi: Dampaknya terhadap tingkat kemiskinan perdesaan di 34 Provinsi Indonesia

Wardha Tia Ivani; Ilmiawan Auwalin

doi:10.53088/jerps.v4i2.1077

Authors

Wardha Tia Ivani Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga
Ilmiawan Auwalin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jerps.v4i2.1077

Keywords:

Rural Poverty, Sectoral GRDP Rate, RLS, TPT, Village Fund

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of economic growth based on sectoral composition on the rural poverty rate of 34 provinces in Indonesia in the 2011-2020 period. The method used is panel data regression because the data combines 2011-2020 time series data and cross-sectional data from 34 provinces in Indonesia using the REM model (Random Effect Model). The variables used in this study are the GRDP rate of the agricultural sector, the GRDP rate of the non-agricultural sector, the average length of schooling, the open unemployment rate, and village funds on the level of rural poverty in Indonesia. The results showed that simultaneously, all independent variables had a significant effect on the level of rural poverty in Indonesia, and partially, the agricultural sector GDP rate, average length of schooling, and open unemployment rate significantly reduced poverty. However, the GRDP rate variable in the non-agricultural sector and village funds has no significant effect on reducing poverty.

References

Arunachalam, R., & Shenoy, A. (2017). Poverty traps, convergence, and the dynamics of household income. Journal of Development Economics, 126(C), 215–230.

Basyir, A. H., & Syahnur, S. (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemiskinan Di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi: Program Pascasarjana Unsyiah, 3(1).

Benfica, R., & Henderson, H. (2021). The Effect of the Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth on Rural and Urban Poverty*. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(1), 248–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12462

Bezemer, D., & Headey, D. (2008). Agriculture, Development, and Urban Bias. World Development, 36(8), 1342–1364.

Bukhari, E. (2021). Pengaruh Dana Desa dalam Mengentaskan Kemiskinan Penduduk Desa. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 21(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v21i2.540

Christiaensen, L., Demery, L., & Kuhl, J. (2011). The (evolving) role of agriculture in poverty reduction—An empirical perspective. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.10.006

de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction: Additional Evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 25, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp015

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Hofmarcher, T. (2021). The effect of education on poverty: A European perspective. Economics of Education Review, 83, 102124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102124

Imai, K. S., Gaiha, R., & Thapa, G. (2015). Does non-farm sector employment reduce rural poverty and vulnerability? Evidence from Vietnam and India. Journal of Asian Economics, 36, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2015.01.001

Ivanic, M., & Martin, W. (2018). Sectoral Productivity Growth and Poverty Reduction: National and Global Impacts. World Development, 109, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.004

Loayza, N. V., & Raddatz, C. (2010). The composition of growth matters for poverty alleviation. Journal of Development Economics, 93(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.03.008

Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Macroeconomics (Ninth edition). Worth Publishers.

Mellor, J. W. (with Internet Archive). (1976). The new economics of growth: A strategy for India and the developing world. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press. http://archive.org/details/neweconomicsofgr0000mell

Meo, M. S., Kumar, B., Chughtai, S., Javed, V., Dost, M. K., & Nisar, Q. (2020). Impact of Unemployment and Governance on Poverty in Pakistan: A Fresh Insight from Non-linear ARDL Co-integration Approach. Global Business Review, 24, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920920440

Montalvo, J. G., & Ravallion, M. (2010). The pattern of growth and poverty reduction in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(1), 2–16.

Odeh, M. A., & Christie O, O. (2014). Poverty Reduction Policy and Youth Unemployment in Nigeria. Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(3), 92.

Orazem, P., Glewwe, P., & Patrinos, H. (2009). The benefits and costs of lowering parental schooling costs to improve educational outcomes. Copenhagen Consensus center best practice paper: new advice from cc08. Denmark: Copenhagen Consensus Center.

Prasetyoningrum, A. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (Ipm), Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Dan Pengangguran Terhadap Kemiskinan Di Indonesia. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 6, 217. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v6i2.3663

Purnami, N. M. S., & Saskara, I. A. N. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Pendidikan dan Kontribusi Sektor Pertanian Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi serta Jumlah Penduduk Miskin. E-Jurnal EP Unud, 5(11), 1188-1218.

Rammohan, A., & Tohari, A. (2023). Rural poverty and labour force participation: Evidence from Indonesia’s Village fund program. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0283041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283041

Ravallion, M., & Datt, G. (1996). How Important to India’s Poor Is the Sectoral Composition of Economic Growth? World Bank Economic Review, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/10.1.1

Salayang, J., Laoh, O. E. H., & Kapantow, G. H. M. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kemiskinan Di Sulawesi Utara. AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI, 14(3), 339. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.14.3.2018.22600

Sari, I. M., & Abdullah, M. F. (2017). Analisis Ekonomi Kebijakan Dana Desa Terhadap Kemiskinan Desa Di Kabupaten Tulungagung. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 15(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.22219/jep.v15i1.4645

Setianingsih, I. (2016). Kontribusi dana desa dalam menurunkan angka kemiskinan di Kabupaten Melawi. Jurnal Ekonomi Daerah (JEDA), 5(3).

Suryahadi, A., Suryadarma, D., & Sumarto, S. (2009). The effects of location and sectoral components of economic growth on poverty: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.08.003

Susilowati, N. I., Susilowati, D., & Hadi, S. (2017). Pengaruh alokasi dana desa, dana desa, belanja modal, dan produk domestik regional bruto terhadap kemiskinan kabupaten/kota di jawa timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 1(4), 514-526.

Tampubolon, D., & Kurniasih, C. E. (2022). Efek Komposisi Sektoral Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Terhadap Kemiskinan di Riau. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 3(3), 521-530.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2012). Economic development (11th ed). Addison-Wesley.

Tombolotutu, A., Djirimu, M., Lutfi, M., & Anggadini, F. (2018). Impact of life expectancy, literacy rate, opened unemployment rate and gross domestic regional income per capita on poverty in the districts/city in Central Sulawesi Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 157, 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/157/1/012058

Van der Berg, S. (2008). Poverty and education. Education policy series, 10(28), 1-28.

Winters, L. A., McCulloch, N., & McKay, A. (2004). Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 72–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205104773558056