Does green gross regional domestic product accommodate environmental quality and the public's welfare?

Authors

  • Alief Rakhman Setyanto faculty Economy and Business islam UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Raizki Rienaldi Pramasha Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53088/jerps.v3i2.752

Keywords:

Green GRDP, Sector agriculture, Plantation sector

Abstract

The economic theory of development developed from gross domestic product to observe the development of a sustainable needed connection between environmental quality and welfare society. This research aims to review the green GRDP picture to accommodate ecological quality and the welfare of society. This research uses a descriptive method with secondary data sources from a literature study. It analyzes it in-depth about Green GRDP, which previously used Brown GRDP as a basis for analyzing regional economic growth in Lampung Province. The research results obtained at the level of green GRDP growth have had high economic consequences on the agriculture and plantations sector since environmental constraints corrected them. However, a quality environment can fulfill hope for society for a more decent life. Recommendations that can be given in this study are related to the implementation of green GRDP, potentially accommodating the well-being acquired by society from the agricultural sector and plantations to increase regional economic growth in Lampung Province.

References

Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., & Pimentel, D. (1995). Economics Growth Carrying, Capacity and the environment. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 91–95.

Azharsyah, I. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam. Bumi Aksara.

Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2017). Scientists’ views on economic growth versus the environment: a questionnaire survey among economists and non-economists. Global Environmental Change, 46(August), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.007

Effendie. (2019). Ekonomi Lingkungan Suatu tinjauan teoritik dan praktek. UPP STIM YKPN.

Febriana, S., Diartho, H. C., & Istiyani, N. (2019). Hubungan pembangunan ekonomi terhadap kualitas lingkungan hidup di provinsi jawa timur. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(2), 58–70.

Ghozali, I. & R. D. (2013). Analisis Multivariat dan Ekonometrika. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Huang, D. (2023). Research on the Development Level of Green GDP. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Financial Management and Economic Transition (FMET 2022) (pp. 503–508). Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-054-1_54

Jhingan, M. L. (2016). Ekonomi pembangunan dan perencanaan. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kuncoro, M. (2013). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis & Ekonomi (4th ed.). Penerbit Erlangga.

Neuman W.Lawrence. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial : Pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Indeks.

Nugroho, S., & Murtilaksono, K. (2020). PDRB Hijau dalam Perkembangan Wilayah di Kota Depok. 222–235.

Putra, W. (2013). Model Perhitungan Besaran PDRB Hijau Sektor Kehutanan di Kalimantan Barat melalui Pendekatan Jasa Lingkungan. Eksos, 9(1), 49–68.

Ratnaningsih, M., Apriliani, A. T., Sudharto, D., & Suparmoko. (2006). PDRB Hijau (Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Hijau). BPFE.

Sidjabat, F. M., & Apsari, A. (2020). The Green GDP Implementation in Country-Based Environmental Management System: A Review. Serambi Engineering, V(4).

Supomo, bambang & I. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis (kedua). Yogyakarta.

Suryanto. (2009). Mampukah PDB Hijau Mengakomodasi Degradasi Lingkungan Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat? Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 10(1), 99–109.

Todaro, M. P. (2000). Pembangunan Ekonomi dunia ketiga (jilid 1). Erlangga.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Setyanto, A. R., & Pramasha, R. R. (2023). Does green gross regional domestic product accommodate environmental quality and the public’s welfare?. Journal of Economics Research and Policy Studies, 3(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.53088/jerps.v3i2.752