Modern mathematics teaching methods and their role in developing academic achievement literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53088/jsel.v3i2.3772Keywords:
Modern Teaching Approaches, Mathematics Teaching, Inquiry-Based Learning, Flipped Learning, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the most prominent contemporary approaches to mathematics teaching and examine their contribution to students’ academic achievement. The study uses a descriptive-analytical approach (reviewing and analyzing a body of relevant educational literature and previous theoretical and empirical studies on contemporary mathematics teaching approaches such as flipped learning, inquiry based learning, project based learning, technology enhanced learning and artificial intelligence). Studies reviewed were compared to determine their main findings about how these approaches contribute to mathematics learning and academic achievement. Contemporary mathematics teaching approaches can positively contribute to students’ academic achievement through active participation in class, classroom interaction, mathematical thinking, problem solving skills and practical application of mathematical knowledge. Digital technologies and artificial intelligence also offer opportunities for more interactive and personalized learning experiences but effectiveness may vary depending on instructional design, educational context, student characteristics and appropriate integration of technology into learning process. Contemporary mathematics teaching approaches support the transition from teacher-centered instruction to more learner-centered practices. Therefore, it recommends professional development for teachers, incorporation of appropriate digital technologies and AI into mathematics instruction, learning environments that promote inquiry, problem solving, interaction and active student participation.
References
Al-Mukhini, W. R. R. (2026). Mathematics teachers’ perceptions and practices of inquiry-based teaching in basic education schools in the Sultanate of Oman. Discover Education, 5(511), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01380-6
Almutairi S, Heller M, Yen D (2020) Reclaiming the heterogeneity of the Arab states. Cross Cultural Strategic Management, 28(1), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2019-0170
Berg, A., & Holst, S. (2024). Inquiry-based linear algebra teaching and learning in a flipped classroom framework: A case study. PRIMUS, 35(9-10), 1071-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2024.2375712
Cheng L, Ritzhaupt A, Antonenko P (2019) Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4):793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52, 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01196-0
Cotic, M., Doz, D., Jenko, M., & Žakelj, A. (2024). Mathematics education: What was it, what is it, and what will it be? International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14700
Demir, M., Kaya, M., Çelik, A., & Filiz, T. (2024). The effect of technology-based mathematics teaching on mathematics performance: A second-order meta-analysis. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 14(2), 260–285.
https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.140189
Deringöl, Y. (2020). Methods and techniques that classroom teachers use in mathematics lesson. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.467893
Dignath C, Büttner G (2008) Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
Doğan, A., & Kütükçü, S. (2024). Classroom teachers' perspectives on new approaches to teaching mathematics. Asian Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1497320
Donker AS, De Boer H, Kostons D, Van Ewijk CD, Van der Werf MP (2014) Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11(9), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest among secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8131–8150.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Eraytaç, Ö. F., & Tarım, K. (2024). 6. Sınıf matematik dersinde teknoloji destekli öğretimin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 20(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1482878
Fadzil, N. M., & Osman, S. (2025). Scoping the landscape: Comparative review of collaborative learning methods in mathematical problem-solving pedagogy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15935
Giambona F., & Porcu M. (2015) Student background determinants of reading achievement in Italy. A quantile regression analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 44(September 2015), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.07.005
Hallinger P, Hammad W (2019) Knowledge production on educational leadership and management in Arab societies: a systematic review of research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717280
Hwang, S. (2022). Examining the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Elementary Students’ Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 14(20), 13185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013185
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M.B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Cooperative Learning Center at the University of Minnesota
Karlberg, M., Kilborn, W., & Eriksson, P. (2021). Mathematical problem-solving through cooperative learning—The importance of peer acceptance and friendships. Frontiers in Education, 6, 710296. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.710296
Kayan-Fadlelmula F, Sellami A, Abdelkader N, Umer S (2022) A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
Lessani, A., Yunus, A., & Bakar, K. (2017). Comparison of New Mathematics Teaching Methods with Traditional Method. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1285–1297. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.12851297
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education, (1–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1
Liu, J., Abdul, A., Amin, A., Aziku, M., & Chen, Y. (2024). Can inquiry-based pedagogy improve math performance? Evidence from 5711 students in Vietnam on the mediating role of math attitude. International Journal of Educational Development, 111, 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103170
Maasz, J., & Schloeglmann, W. (2006). New Mathematics Education Research and Practice. Sense Publishers.
Pardos, Z. A., & Bhandari, S. (2024). ChatGPT-generated help produces learning gains equivalent to human tutor-authored help on mathematics skills. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0304013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304013
Pellegrini M., Lake C., Neitzel A, Slavin R.E. (2021). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: a meta-analysis. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986211
Pham, K. T., Thi Do, L. H., Dinh, H. V. T., Nguyen, Q. A. T., Phan, Q. N., & Ha, X. V. (2024). Professional development of primary school teachers in Vietnamese educational reform context: an analysis from a sociocultural perspective. Education 3-13, 52(3), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2168502
Phiwkham, T., & Thienyutthakul, S. (2024). A Study of Mathematical Learning Achievement on Problems Including Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division of Fractions and Mixed Numbers by Using the STAD Cooperative Learning Management with Skill Exercises of Grade 5 Students. Journal of Education Yala Rajabhat University, 3(2), 99–110. https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jeduyru/article/view/2796
Rijken, P. E., & Fraser, B. J. (2024). Effectiveness of project-based mathematics in first-year high school in terms of learning environment and student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 27, 241–263.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09477-7
Safitri, S. A., & Rizki, N. A. (2024). Analisis Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project-Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Kelas VII SMP Boarding-School. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(2), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v10i2.6273
Sánchez-Martín, J., et al. (2021). Analysis of the use and integration of the flipped learning model, project-based learning, and gamification methodologies by secondary school mathematics teachers. Sustainability, 13(5), 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052606
Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: Tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8
Suttivilai, W., & Kamrat, N. (2024). The Effects of Cooperative Learning STAD Technique with Graphic Organizer on Learning Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics Learning on Mathayomsuksa 1 Students. Education Journal Faculty of Education, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University, 7(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2774.EDU2024.2.265970
Weigand, H.-G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9
Yoon, J., & Kwon, O. N. (2024). Systematic literature review on AI-based mathematics teaching and learning: Focusing on the role of AI and teachers. The Mathematics Education, 63(3), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2024.63.3.573
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asmaa Salih Jasim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license that allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s) and license their new creations under the identical terms.
License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
